Best practice: classroom acoustics – a sound education
Sound quality has a very real impact on teaching and learning
standards. Connect explains how health and safety professionals can
help to improve things.
Headlines
- according to the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, those
who work in education are eight times more likely to suffer voice
problems than any other worker
- reflections of sound off walls can increase noise and reduce
the quality of sound, making it both difficult to hear and
potentially damaging to the ears
- Building Bulletin 93 has applied to the building of new school
classrooms since 2003, providing guidance and a regulatory
framework for the acoustic design of schools
- teachers should log their noise exposure times for a typical
week and correlate that with noise dose, with the help of a safety
advisor
As most of us know, too much noise can cause long-term hearing
damage, while poor classroom acoustics can make it difficult for
pupils to concentrate or to distinguish speech against background
noise. And many teachers are risking long-term damage to their
voices as they strain to make themselves heard. In fact, according
to the
Association of Teachers and Lecturers, workers in this
profession are eight times more likely to suffer voice problems
than any other worker.
Under the Control of Noise at
Work Regulations 2005, the first action level for noise in the
workplace is 80 decibels. At this level, employers must assess the
risk to workers’ health and provide them with information and
training. Hearing protection becomes compulsory at 85 decibels,
based on an average figure for daily or weekly exposure. Noise
levels in schools and colleges can exceed these levels – in music
rooms, for example, or in carpentry and joinery workshops when
machinery is being used.
In some cases, noise levels are high enough to make hearing
protection compulsory, but in others, it might be worn on a
voluntary basis. This, in turn, presents challenges – there are
accounts of disposable ear plugs being difficult to fit and
muffling sound so that lecturers have to shout to be heard, once
more raising those voice problems. To resolve the issues, some
colleges have provided ear defenders with intercoms, but these come
at considerable cost.
“Acoustics can pose a significant problem if
classrooms are not purpose-built,” says David James of the
Industrial Noise and Vibration Centre,
who runs IOSH professional
development courses in noise and vibration at work.
“Reflections of sound off walls can increase noise and reduce the
quality of sound, making it both difficult to hear and potentially
damaging to the ears. Echoing classrooms – where sound reverberates
for a long time – can also reduce the clarity of speech, while poor
wall insulation, such as folding room dividers or partitions that
extend only to the false ceiling, allow in noise from adjacent
classrooms. If that’s a loud noise – say from a music lesson – it
can have quite a disruptive effect on the lesson, and on pupils’
concentration.”
Building blocks
Many noise and acoustic issues are part of the fabric of school
buildings, and regulations are now in place to address these. James
explains that Section 1 of Building Bulletin 93
gives the performance targets for compliance with Requirement E4
from Part E of the Building Regulations 2000: “Each room or other
space in a school building shall have the acoustic conditions and
the insulation against disturbance by noise appropriate to its
normal use.”
Building Bulletin 93 has applied to the building of new school
classrooms since 2003, providing guidance and a regulatory
framework for the acoustic design of schools. But it doesn’t only
apply to new buildings. Many of the UK’s schools are much older,
and even modern school buildings that predate Building Bulletin 93
were often built using lightweight materials that don’t stop sound
getting in from outside.
“All school buildings are now subject to
detailed design checks and on-site inspections by building control
officers,” explains James, adding that the Control of Noise at Work
Regulations are there to protect teachers, while general duties
under the Health and Safety at Work Act will safeguard pupils. “If
measures are correctly applied according to the regulations, there
should be no risk to students’ hearing.”
Assessing the risk
The sheer variety of classrooms in terms of age, dimensions,
materials and use can make acoustic assessment seem a daunting
task. Not so, says James: “Taking a music classroom as an example,
issues such as room size, room acoustics and the spacing of pupils
will make similar music sources have a different noise level
according to the environment.”
The HSE stresses that the length of exposure to noise (dose) is
as important as the decibel level.
“Risk assessments are performed with a
combination of hand-held instruments and personal dosimetry,”
explains James. “In a music room, you’d assess each instrument or
group of instruments and relate level to dose based on typical
practice/performance times for students and teachers. However,
there’s already published information on indicative noise
exposures, so a combination of limited measurements, published
values and a log of typical exposure times for staff and students
should provide the basis for a risk assessment.”
Noises off
While purpose-built classrooms will involve a significant amount
of money, modifications to existing classrooms can be surprisingly
straightforward and cost-effective.
“Carpets, drapes, acoustic screens, redesign
of speaker layouts and amplifier volumes are some of the measures
that schools can take,” says James. “Craft departments could make
some of the improvements using standard, low-cost noise control
materials.”
Students and teachers can also help themselves. “In the music
room, noisy and quiet pieces could be mixed so there isn’t
prolonged exposure to high noise levels,” says James. “Musicians’
plugs can be used to reduce noise exposure without cutting out
sound, and practice mutes and drummers’ practice pads should be
used. Teachers can safeguard themselves by standing offline from
directional instruments such as brass, and acoustic screening can
be used to separate teachers from students.”
Careful monitoring will also help to identify any issues and
resolve them before they cause problems, says James:
“Teachers should log their exposure times for
a typical week and correlate that with noise dose, with the help of
a safety advisor.”
A sound education
Fittingly, the effective prevention of classroom acoustic
problems begins in the classroom. From the MP3 players they listen
to now, to the working environments they’ll find themselves in as
they get older, noise is a key area for the development of hazard
awareness in young people. In fact, teachers of some subjects,
including music and design technology, have a responsibility to
make noise awareness part of their students’ education.
“Teachers and students should have noise
awareness training,” says James. “Teachers should be aware of the
risks presented by long-term exposure to high levels of sound and
present noise awareness sessions to each new group of students.
This advice could include the message that noise-induced hearing
loss is caused by excessive exposure to sound from any source, and
the hearing mechanism doesn’t differentiate between pleasant
sources such as music and less appealing sounds such as industrial
machinery producing the same noise level.
“The students should also carry this
awareness to out-of-school activities such as performing in bands
and the added risks from using personal stereos at high
volume.”
Noise is just one of the risks covered by IOSH’s Workplace Hazard Awareness
Course (WHAC), an accessible and interactive course designed to
help teachers prepare their students for the real world. WHAC
supports the delivery of an entry-level qualification from the
British Safety Council Awards. WHAC is free to download for
teachers or anyone who delivers free or publicly-funded
training.
Links
Sound Advice